Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Brain Behav Immun ; 118: 192-201, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432599

ABSTRACT

Despite decades of research on the pathophysiology of depression, the development of new therapeutic interventions has been slow, and no biomarkers of treatment response have been clinically implemented. Several lines of evidence suggest that the clinical and biological heterogeneity among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) has hampered progress in this field. MDD with low-grade inflammation - "inflamed depression" - is a subtype of depression that may be associated with a superior antidepressant treatment response to anti-inflammatory compounds. Omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) has anti-inflammatory properties, and preliminary data suggest that it may be particularly efficacious in inflamed depression. In this study we tested the hypothesis that add-on EPA has greater antidepressant efficacy in MDD patients with high baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) compared to MDD patients with low hs-CRP. All subjects received 2.2 g EPA, 400 mg docosahexaenoic acid and 800 mg of other fatty acids daily for 8 weeks, added to stable ongoing antidepressant treatment. The primary outcome was change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). Patients and raters were blind to baseline hs-CRP status. In an intention-to-treat analysis including all subjects with at least one post baseline visit (n = 101), ahs-CRPcut-off of ≥1 mg/L, but not ≥3 mg/L, was associated with a greater improvement in HAMD-17 total score. In addition to a general antidepressant effect among patients with hs-CRP ≥ 1 mg/L, adjuvant EPA treatment improved symptoms putatively related to inflamed depression such as fatigue and sleep difficulties. This adds to the mounting evidence that delineation of MDD subgroups based on inflammation may be clinically relevant to predict treatment response to anti-inflammatory interventions.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Fatty Acids, Omega-3 , Humans , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depression/drug therapy , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/therapeutic use , Docosahexaenoic Acids/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/chemically induced , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 801, 2022 12 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36536364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most antidepressant treatment studies have included patients strictly based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders definition of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Given the heterogeneity of MDD, this approach may have obscured inter-patient differences and hampered the development of novel and targeted treatment strategies. An alternative strategy is ​​to use biomarkers to delineate endophenotypes of depression and test if these can be targeted via mechanism-based interventions. Several lines of evidence suggest that "inflammatory depression" is a clinically meaningful subtype of depression. Preliminary data indicate that omega-3 fatty acids, with their anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties, may be efficacious in this subtype of depression, and this study aims to test this hypothesis. METHOD: We conduct a match-mismatch-trial to test if add-on omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) reduces depressive symptoms in patients with MDD and systemic low-grade inflammation. MDD patients on a stable antidepressant treatment are stratified at baseline on high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels to a high-inflammation group (hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/L) or a low-inflammation group (hs-CRP < 3 mg/L). Both groups receive add-on EPA (2 g per day) for 8 weeks with three study visits, all including blood draws. Patients and raters are blind to inflammation status. Primary outcome measure is change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score between baseline and week 8. We hypothesize that the inflammation group has a superior antidepressant response to EPA compared to the non-inflammation group. Secondary outcomes include a composite score of "inflammatory depressive symptoms", quality of life, anxiety, anhedonia, sleep disturbances, fatigue, cognitive performance and change in biomarkers relating to inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolomics and cellular aging. DISCUSSION: In this study we will, for the first time using a match-mismatch trial design, test if omega-3 is an efficacious treatment for inflammatory depression. If our study is successful, it could add to the field of precision psychiatry. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered May 8, 2017 on clinicaltrials.gov under the reference number NCT03143075.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Eicosapentaenoic Acid , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(4)2021 Feb 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561973

ABSTRACT

Treatment of depression is hampered by the failure to identify distinct symptom profiles with distinct pathophysiologies that differentially respond to distinct treatments. We posit that inflammatory depression is a meaningful depression subtype associated with specific symptoms and biological abnormalities. We review several upstream, potentially causative, mechanisms driving low-grade inflammation in this subtype of depression. We also discuss downstream mechanisms mediating the link between inflammation and symptoms of depression, including alterations in dopaminergic neurotransmission and tryptophan metabolism. Finally, we review evidence for several non-pharmacological interventions for inflammatory depression, including probiotics, omega-3 fatty acids, and physical exercise interventions. While some evidence suggests that these interventions may be efficacious in inflammatory depression, future clinical trials should consider enriching patient populations for inflammatory markers, or stratify patients by inflammatory status, to confirm or refute this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Depression/pathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/pathology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/cerebrospinal fluid , Depression/immunology , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Dopaminergic Neurons/physiology , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Exercise/physiology , Humans , Inflammation/pathology , Inflammation/psychology , Synaptic Transmission/physiology , Tryptophan/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL